dee_burris: (Default)
[personal profile] dee_burris
This has got to be one of the most elitest things I've seen written about amateur family historians in a long time.

I'm not big on government oversight or regulation of everything in our lives, but sometimes I wonder if we should require folks to have a research license (sort of like a driver's license) before they can publish their "work," in print or on the Internet. At the core of this licensing program would be an understanding of some really important terms, including sources, information, evidence, and proof.

Pardon my French, but I'll be damned if anyone is going to tell me I have to have a license to publish my GEDCOM, or blog about my own family history.

I made my comment and shared it to my Facebook wall.

Credit Family Tree Magazine for calling the snotty diatribe article to my attention.

Date: 2012-11-20 04:06 am (UTC)
rainbow: text "out of spoons error. please reinstall universe and reboot" (Default)
From: [personal profile] rainbow
Wow, the author certainly takes the prize for the most arrogant, condescending, and clueless about the world post I've seen in a while.

Go you for calling her on it!


dee_burris: (Default)
Dee Burris Blakley

November 2015

1516 1718192021

Shakin' the Family Tree on Facebook

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 28th, 2015 10:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios